11 December 2012

WHAT??

All I do is write on a blog. It's certainly not professional, and no one pays me for anything I do here. (In fact, no one pays me for anything I do right now. Interesting. I should work on that.)

In any event, as an unpaid, non-professional blogger, I feel totally fine making fun of weird sentences and headlines in the commercial media. I know I'm not perfect, but some of these people need to try a bit harder

Here are some of my favorites I've seen lately:

  • Headline: Men who have cancer more likely to die from it (Ed.: uh, yeah, men who have cancer are lots more likely to die from it...than men who don't...pretty sure we're missing something here.)
  • A line from an article: Brunch said it's remarkable that Berger survived--at least more than half of people whose hearts stop die.  (Ed.: Really? At least more than half of them??)
  • A line from another article: The Disaster Preparedness Commission met biannually some years, but there are gaps in which there is no record of a meeting. (Ed.: Please, google "biannually.")
Is it just me? Has law school made me too critical in my reading? Or do we just have a lot of sloppy professional writing on our hands?

3 comments:

Unknown said...

Well... so the last one is English's fault. Biannual can mean either every other year or twice a year. Likewise ambiguous is biweekly.

Dictionaries will probably disagree. It looks like they came up with semiannual and biennial to be more specific.

More Bacon said...

I have no problem simultaneously blaming the author AND English for that one. It has become so used both ways that it's hopelessly mysterious. I think people should use alternatives to be clear.

But I'm picky that way.

LL said...

Makes me CRAZY when I find things like that on NPR or CNN...feel free to read through it before you post, hosers!